Picture child's feet next to pens, pencils and paper

Open Access research that is helping to improve educational outcomes for children

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Education, including those researching educational and social practices in curricular subjects. Research in this area seeks to understand the complex influences that increase curricula capacity and engagement by studying how curriculum practices relate to cultural, intellectual and social practices in and out of schools and nurseries.

Research at the School of Education also spans a number of other areas, including inclusive pedagogy, philosophy of education, health and wellbeing within health-related aspects of education (e.g. physical education and sport pedagogy, autism and technology, counselling education, and pedagogies for mental and emotional health), languages education, and other areas.

Explore Open Access education research. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4-16 years : a systematic review

Gascoine, Louise and Higgins, Steve and Wall, Kate (2017) The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4-16 years : a systematic review. Review of Education, 5. pp. 3-57. ISSN 2049-6613

[img]
Preview
Text (Gascoine-etal-2016-The-assessment-of-metacognition-in-children-aged-4-16-years)
Gascoine_etal_2016_The_assessment_of_metacognition_in_children_aged_4_16_years.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

This article presents the results of a syste matic review of methods that have been used to measure or assess metacognition in children aged 4-16 years over a 20-year period (1992-2012). It includes an overview of the types of tool and methods used linked with the ages of the participants targeted an d how metacognition and associated concepts are defined. 2721 records were identified through systematic searching; 525 articles or reports were full text screened, resulting in 149 included studies reporting 84 distinct tools or methods. Of these four we re excluded from further analysis after appraisal for reliability, validity and replicability. The final number of methods and tools for metacognitive assessment included in the analysis is 80. The key findings of this review include: • Self-report measures (including questionnaires, surveys and tests) comprise 61% of the included tools. • Observational methods that do not rely on prompting to ‘think aloud’ (Think Aloud Protocols) have only been used with students aged 9 years and under; • Information about relia bility and validity is not always given or given accurately for different tools and methods; • The definition of metacognition in a particular study relates directly to its assessment and therefore its outcomes: this can be misaligned.