Sextual intercourse : considering social-cognitive predictors and subsequent outcomes of sexting behaviour in adulthood
Brodie, Zara P. and Wilson, Claire and Scott, Graham G. (2019) Sextual intercourse : considering social-cognitive predictors and subsequent outcomes of sexting behaviour in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48. 2367–2379. ISSN 1573-2800 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Brodie_etal_ASB2019_Sextual_intercourse_considering_social_cognitive_predictors_subsequent_outcomes_sexting_behaviour.pdf
Final Published Version License: Download (677kB)| Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify specific social–cognitive factors that may influence the likelihood of engaging in sexting, and potential positive and negative outcomes of such behaviors, in adults. We asked 244 adult participants (64.5% women) to complete a set of online measures reflecting sexting engagement, social–cognitive factors (definitions, differential association, differential reinforcement, and imitation), and outcomes of sexting behavior (risky sexual behavior appraisal, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results showed that 77.6% of our sample had sexted. Sexting in the context of a romantic relationship was predicted by differential reinforcement and friend imitation, while positive definitions of sexting alone predicted sexting someone outside the context of a romantic relationship. This indicates that motivations for sexting engagement may be context specific in adulthood. Those who had sexted demonstrated significantly higher sexual satisfaction than those who had never sexted. However, sexting outside of a romantic relationship predicted reduced perceived risk and heightened perceived benefit of engaging in real-life risky sexual behaviors. This suggests there may be both positive and negative implications of sexting engagement in adulthood.
ORCID iDs
Brodie, Zara P., Wilson, Claire ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-4928 and Scott, Graham G.;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 77788 Dates: DateEvent9 September 2019Published12 June 2019AcceptedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Institute of Education > Education Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 16 Sep 2021 10:01 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 13:13 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/77788