Development and validity of the Motivation Assessment Tool for Physical Education (MAT-PE) among young children

Tools

Fitton Davies, K. and Watson, P.M. and Rudd, J.R. and Roberts, S. and Bardid, F. and Knowles, Z. and Foweather, L. (2021) Development and validity of the Motivation Assessment Tool for Physical Education (MAT-PE) among young children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 54. 101915. ISSN 1469-0292 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101915)

[thumbnail of Fitton-Davies-etal-PSE2021-Development-and-validity-Motivation-Assessment-Tool-for-physical-education]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Fitton_Davies_etal_PSE2021_Development_and_validity_Motivation_Assessment_Tool_for_physical_education.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Introduction: It is important to understand young children's motivation within Physical Education (PE) so that researchers and teachers can effectively support children's physical, affective, social and cognitive development as well as physical activity (PA) behaviors. However, there is a dearth of motivation research in PE with children under the age of seven due to a lack of developmentally appropriate assessment tools. Aims: This multi-study paper outlines the development, content and construct validity of a novel, mixed-method tool to assess young children's psychological needs and behavioral regulation within PE (Motivation Assessment Tool for Physical Education; MAT-PE). Methods: Study 1 consisted of the iterative development of the MAT-PE through working with 43 young children (ages 5–6) from three primary schools located within a large city in North West England. MAT-PE version 1 was subsequently examined for content validity in 85 children (ages 5–6) from 12 primary schools located within a large city in North West England and nine independent researchers with expertise in self-determination theory. Study 2 consisted of the development, content validation, acceptability and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the MAT-PE codebook. Study 3 explored construct validity through hypothesis-testing via correlational data. Descriptive data captured through the MAT-PE and codebook with 78 children (ages 5–6) from 12 primary schools located within a large city in North West England is also presented. Findings: The MAT-PE and its codebook were judged to have promising content validity, the codebook was deemed acceptable, as well as demonstrating excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.90). Regarding construct validity, as hypothesised, all psychological needs were positively correlated and autonomous regulations were negatively associated with amotivation. There were also unexpected correlations such as the negative correlation between intrinsic and identified regulation. Conclusion: Further development of the MAT-PE is required; nevertheless, this study has taken a promising first step in developing a tool to comprehensively measure five-to six-year-old children's motivational perceptions in PE.

ORCID iDs

Fitton Davies, K., Watson, P.M., Rudd, J.R., Roberts, S., Bardid, F. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-0596, Knowles, Z. and Foweather, L.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)