Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Interrogating the concept of 'leadership at all levels' : a Scottish perspective

Mowat, Joan G. and McMahon, Margery (2019) Interrogating the concept of 'leadership at all levels' : a Scottish perspective. Professional Development in Education, 45 (2). pp. 173-189. ISSN 1941-5257

[img] Text (Mowat-PDIE-2018-Interrogating-the-concept-of-leadership-at-all-levels)
Mowat_PDIE_2018_Interrogating_the_concept_of_leadership_at_all_levels.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 February 2020.

Download (794kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

    Abstract

    The concept of ‘leadership at all levels’ has gained currency in Scottish education in recent years following the publication of ‘Teaching Scotland’s Future’ (2010), a major review of teacher education focussing on teachers’ initial preparation, their on-going development and career progression. This paper traces the drivers of change that led to the recommendations in the review and subsequent developments and interrogates the concept through examination of the policy context. The paper argues that, whilst there have been many positive developments in advancing leadership and leadership education in Scotland, the concept of ‘leadership at all levels’ is problematic and there are many tensions which need to be addressed. In particular, the paper examines the tension between systems-led leadership development and that which focuses on the professional development of the individual, commensurate with the stage of their career, and argues that models that are more fluid and flexible allowing movement in, across and through the system are required.