When opposites attract? Exploring the existence of complementarity in self-brand congruence processes
Karampela, Maria and Tregear, Angela and Ansell, Jonathan and Dunnett, Susan (2018) When opposites attract? Exploring the existence of complementarity in self-brand congruence processes. Psychology and Marketing, 35 (8). pp. 573-585. ISSN 0742-6046 (https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21107)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Karampela_etal_PM_2018_Exploring_the_existence_of_complementarity_in_self_brand_congruence_processes.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (671kB)| Preview |
Abstract
In the psychology of human interpersonal attraction, complementarity is a well-recognized phenomenon, where individuals are attracted to partners with different but complementary traits to their own. Although scholarship in human-brand relations draws heavily from interpersonal attraction theory, preferred techniques for measuring self-brand congruence tend to capture it in only one form: the similarity configuration, which expresses the extent to which brand traits essentially resemble or mirror a consumer’s own. Hence, the aim of this study is to explore, for the first time, the existence of complementarity in self-brand congruence. From a canonical correlation analysis of survey data in which respondents rated their own personality traits and those of their favorite brand, the existence of both similarity and complementarity configurations is indeed revealed. Based on this, the study then derives a measure of self-brand congruence that captures both configurations, and tests its predictive power for a range of brand-related outcomes. The new measure is found to perform well against existing measures of self-brand congruence based purely on a similarity configuration, particularly for emotionally based brand-related outcomes.
ORCID iDs
Karampela, Maria ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-4531, Tregear, Angela, Ansell, Jonathan and Dunnett, Susan;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 63774 Dates: DateEvent31 August 2018Published13 May 2018Published Online24 March 2018AcceptedSubjects: Social Sciences > Commerce > Marketing. Distribution of products
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > PsychologyDepartment: Strathclyde Business School > Marketing Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 18 Apr 2018 09:24 Last modified: 29 Nov 2024 01:12 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/63774