Open dialogue peer review: a response to Morag Stuart
Ellis, Sue (2008) Open dialogue peer review: a response to Morag Stuart. The Psychology of Education Review, 32 (2). pp. 11-12. ISSN 1463-9807
Preview |
PDF.
Filename: strathprints027426.pdf
Download (272kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Morag Stuart is right that how best to teach reading has been debated for years and we need clarity about what reading involves and how this develops in beginning readers. I also like her emphasis on teaching and on the importance of teaching phonics early and in a systematic way. The history of 'reading wars' has been unhelpful for researchers, policy-makers, teachers and, most importantly, children. We need to ensure that the debates this time around are more complex and measured. This means that, first, it is important to recognise the socio-cultural basis of literacy. Second, I prefer not to talk in terms of convincing anyone of the 'sense' of one view, but in terms of exploring how different views shed light on the actual task to be achieved - children who can, and do, read.
ORCID iDs
Ellis, Sue ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-5892;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 27426 Dates: DateEventSeptember 2008PublishedSubjects: Education > Special aspects of education
Language and Literature > Philology. LinguisticsDepartment: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Institute of Education > Education Depositing user: Mr Alan Slevin Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 15:39 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 09:31 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/27426