In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding

Tools

Javadi, Yashar and Sweeney, Nina E. and Mohseni, Ehsan and MacLeod, Charles N. and Lines, David and Vasilev, Momchil and Qiu, Zhen and Vithanage, Randika K.W. and Mineo, Carmelo and Stratoudaki, Theodosia and Pierce, Stephen G. and Gachagan, Anthony (2020) In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding. Materials and Design, 195. 108981. ISSN 0261-3069 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108981)

[thumbnail of Javadi-etal-MD-2020-In-process-calibration-of-a-non-destructive-testing-system]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Javadi_etal_MD_2020_In_process_calibration_of_a_non_destructive_testing_system.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (6MB)| Preview

Abstract

In multi-pass welding, there is increasing motivation to move towards in-process defect detection to enable real-time repair; thus avoiding deposition of more layers over a defective weld pass. All defect detection techniques require a consistent and repeatable approach to calibration to ensure that measured defect sizing is accurate. Conventional approaches to calibration employ fixed test blocks with known defect sizes, however, this methodology can lead to incorrect sizing when considering complex geometries, materials with challenging microstructure, and the significant thermal gradients present in materials during the inter-pass inspection period. To circumvent these challenges, the authors present a novel approach to calibration and introduce the concept of in-process calibration applied to ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). The new concept is centred around the manufacturing of a second duplication sample, containing intentionally-embedded tungsten inclusions, with identical process parameters as the main sample. Both samples are then inspected using a high-temperature robotic NDT process to allow direct comparative measurements to be established between the real part and the calibration sample. It is demonstrated that in-process weld defect detection using the in-process calibration technique can more reliably identify defects in samples which would otherwise pass the acceptance test using a traditional calibration.

ORCID iDs

Javadi, Yashar ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-7751, Sweeney, Nina E., Mohseni, Ehsan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-6592, MacLeod, Charles N. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-9769, Lines, David ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-2914, Vasilev, Momchil, Qiu, Zhen ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-7158, Vithanage, Randika K.W. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1023-2564, Mineo, Carmelo, Stratoudaki, Theodosia ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-8664, Pierce, Stephen G. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0312-8766 and Gachagan, Anthony ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-4120;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)