Picture of sea vessel plough through rough maritime conditions

Innovations in marine technology, pioneered through Open Access research...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering based within the Faculty of Engineering.

Research here explores the potential of marine renewables, such as offshore wind, current and wave energy devices to promote the delivery of diverse energy sources. Expertise in offshore hydrodynamics in offshore structures also informs innovations within the oil and gas industries. But as a world-leading centre of marine technology, the Department is recognised as the leading authority in all areas related to maritime safety, such as resilience engineering, collision avoidance and risk-based ship design. Techniques to support sustainability vessel life cycle management is a key research focus.

Explore the Open Access research of the Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Convergent and divergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 motor tests in early childhood

Bardid, Farid and Huyben, Floris and Deconinck, Frederik J A and De Martelaer, Kristine and Seghers, Jan and Lenoir, Matthieu (2016) Convergent and divergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 motor tests in early childhood. Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ. pp. 33-47. ISSN 1543-2777

[img]
Preview
Text (Bardid-etal-APAQ-2016-convergent-and-divergent-validity-between-the-KTK-and-MOT-4-6-motor-tests)
Bardid_etal_APAQ_2016_convergent_and_divergent_validity_between_the_KTK_and_MOT_4_6_motor_tests.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent and divergent validity between the Body Coordination Test for Children (KTK) and the Motor Proficiency Test for 4- to 6-Year-Old Children (MOT 4-6). A total of 638 children (5-6 yr old) took part in the study. The results showed a moderately positive association between the total scores of both tests (r = .63). Moreover, the KTK total score correlated more highly with the MOT 4-6 gross motor score than with the MOT 4-6 fine motor score (r = .62 vs. .32). Levels of agreement were moderate when identifying children with moderate or severe motor problems and low at best when detecting children with higher motor-competence levels. This study provides evidence of convergent and divergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6. However, given the moderate to low levels of agreement, either measurement may lead to possible categorization errors. Children's motor competence should therefore not be judged based on the result of a single test.