Evaluation of pulse eddy current for autonomous airborne inspections

Tools

Zhao, Taiyi and Zhang, Dayi and Watson, Robert and Jackson, William and MacLeod, Charles Norman and Mohseni, Ehsan and Dobie, Gordon (2024) Evaluation of pulse eddy current for autonomous airborne inspections. IEEE Sensors Letters, 8 (8). pp. 1-4. 6009304. ISSN 2475-1472 (https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2024.3424910)

[thumbnail of Zhao-etal-IEEE-SL-2024-Evaluation-of-pulse-eddy-current-for-autonomous]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Zhao-etal-IEEE-SL-2024-Evaluation-of-pulse-eddy-current-for-autonomous.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (3MB)| Preview

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) integrated with Pulsed Eddy Current (PEC) technologies present a potential solution for Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) in environments where manual inspection is impractical or hazardous. PEC inspections conducted via UAVs facilitate remote structural health monitoring and offer invaluable thickness measurements for integrity assessment. Unlike traditional contact ultrasound inspections, PEC provides thickness measurements without necessitating surface contact. However, challenges such as aerodynamic influences, probe angular sensitivity, and alignment errors during autonomous inspections can introduce inaccuracies in thickness measurements. Despite its promising applications, the impact of these challenges on the accuracy and reliability of PEC measurements, particularly in autonomous UAV operations, remains underexplored. Consequently, understanding the influence of PEC sensor alignment on UAV inspections becomes vital for ensuring precise NDT outcomes. This paper evaluates the performance of a conventional commercial PEC sensor for its suitability in autonomous airborne inspections. The PEC sensor is affixed to a robot manipulator and precisely controlled to simulate airborne inspections across various alignment angles. Through systematic analysis, the impact of sensor alignment on inspection accuracy is comprehensively assessed, demonstrating critical factors influencing the reliability of UAV-based PEC NDT. The experimental results indicate that the measurement error in PEC can increase to 0.408 mm when the probe was measuring the thickness of a 20 mm sample and experienced misalignment of 4° along both the x-axis and y-axis. The results enhance knowledge of PEC impacts within UAV setups, improving inspection efficiency, and aiding in UAV design to address these issues—advancements critical for the UAV-based PEC NDT.

ORCID iDs

Zhao, Taiyi, Zhang, Dayi ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-4161, Watson, Robert ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-0044, Jackson, William ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-4722, MacLeod, Charles Norman ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-9769, Mohseni, Ehsan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-6592 and Dobie, Gordon ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-5917;

Persistent Identifier

https://doi.org/10.17868/strath.00089870
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)