Economic vulnerability and poor service delivery made it more difficult for shack-dwellers to comply with COVID-19 restrictions : the impracticability and inequitable burden of universal/unstratified public health policies

Tools

Ellison, GTH and Mattes, RB and Rhoma, H and Wet, T De (2022) Economic vulnerability and poor service delivery made it more difficult for shack-dwellers to comply with COVID-19 restrictions : the impracticability and inequitable burden of universal/unstratified public health policies. Other. medRxiv, New York. (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.07.22273499)

[thumbnail of Ellison-etal-medRxiv-2022-the-impracticability-and-inequitable-burden-of-universal-unstratified-public-health-policies]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Ellison_etal_medRxiv_2022_the_impracticability_and_inequitable_burden_of_universal_unstratified_public_health_policies.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (745kB)| Preview

Abstract

In South Africa, demand for housing close to viable/sustained sources of employment has far outstripped supply; and the size of the population living in temporary structures/shacks (and in poorly serviced informal settlements) has continued to increase. While such dwellings and settlements pose a number of established risks to the health of their residents, the present study aimed to explore whether they might also undermine the potential impact of regulations intended to safeguard public health, such as the stringent lockdown restrictions imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021. Using a representative sample of 1,381 South African households surveyed in May-June 2021, the present study found that respondents in temporary structures/shacks were more likely to report non-compliance (or difficulty in complying) with lockdown restrictions when compared to those living in traditional/formal houses/flats/rooms/hostels (OR:1.61; 95%CI:1.06-2.45). However, this finding was substantially attenuated and lost precision following adjustment for preceding sociodemographic and economic determinants of housing quality (adjusted OR:1.20; 95%CI:0.78-1.87). Instead, respondents were far more likely to report non-compliance (or difficulty in complying) with COVID-19 lockdown restrictions if their dwellings lacked private/indoor toilet facilities (adjusted OR:1.56; 95%CI:1.08,2.22) or they were ‘Black/African’, young, poorly educated and under-employed (regardless of: their socioeconomic position, or whether they resided in temporary structures/shacks, respectively). Restrictions imposed to safeguard public health need to be more sensitively designed to accommodate the critical role that poverty and inadequate service delivery play in limiting the ability of residents living in temporary structures/shacks and inadequately serviced dwellings/settlements to comply.

ORCID iDs

Ellison, GTH, Mattes, RB ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-9385, Rhoma, H and Wet, T De;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)