Editorial : Special issue: Psychodynamic and systems theories perspectives on residential child care
Steckley, Laura (2018) Editorial : Special issue: Psychodynamic and systems theories perspectives on residential child care. Journal of Social Work Practice, 32 (4). pp. 365-372. ISSN 1465-3885 (https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2018.1503168)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Steckley_JSWP_2018_Psychodynamic_and_systems_theories_perspectives.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (292kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Welcome to this special issue on psychodynamic and systems theories perspectives on residential child care. Psychodynamic in fluences have been waning over the last several decades, both generally (Shaver & Mikulincer, 2005) and in residential child care settings (Mann, 2003; Sharpe, 2006). Sigmund Freud, founder of psychoanalysis, has gone from being equated with Copernicus and Darwin in popular magazines of the 1950s (Menand, 2017) to currently being depicted as a cocaine-addicted charlatan who falsified his case studies in a current, popular biography (Crews, 2017). Behaviourism and social learning theory have become more prominent (Shaver & Mikulincer, 2005 ), both of which offer a more positivist interpretation of human nature (Moyn, 2016). Yet there is a strong, international consensus regarding the centrality of relationships in providing good residential child care (Kendrick, Steckley, & McPheat, 2011), and neither behavioural nor social learning theories offer much illumination for making sense of how mind-bogglingly difficult these relationships can be. Practitioners need support to ask and tentatively answer two, fundamental questions: ‘what is happening for the young person in order to make this relationship work and what is happening for me, the carer in order that this relationship works?’ (Sharpe, Daniel, & Degregorio, 2007). Psychodynamic and systems theories offer such support.
ORCID iDs
Steckley, Laura ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6021-2302;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 66434 Dates: DateEvent19 November 2018Published17 July 2018AcceptedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Social Work and Social Policy > Social Work and Social Policy > Social Work Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 21 Dec 2018 11:36 Last modified: 21 Dec 2024 01:18 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/66434