Adherence to sleep restriction therapy – An evaluation of existing measures

Steinmetz, Lisa and Simon, Laura and Feige, Bernd and Riemann, Dieter and Akram, Umair and Crawford, Megan R. and Johann, Anna F. and Spiegelhalder, Kai (2023) Adherence to sleep restriction therapy – An evaluation of existing measures. Journal of Sleep Research, 32 (6). e13975. ISSN 0962-1105 (https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13975)

[thumbnail of Steinmetz-etal-JSR-2023-Adherence-to-sleep-restriction-therapy-an-evaluation-of-existing-measures]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Steinmetz_etal_JSR_2023_Adherence_to_sleep_restriction_therapy_an_evaluation_of_existing_measures.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (670kB)| Preview

Abstract

Summary: Sleep restriction, a key element of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia, involves considerable behavioural changes in patients' lives, leading to side‐effects like increased daytime sleepiness. Studies on sleep restriction rarely report adherence, and when assessed it is often limited to the average number of therapy sessions attended. This study aims to systematically evaluate different measures of adherence to cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia and their relationship with treatment outcome. This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (Johann et al. (2020) Journal of Sleep Research, 29, e13102). The sample included 23 patients diagnosed with insomnia according to DSM‐5 criteria who underwent 8 weeks of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia. The following adherence measures based on sleep diary data were used: number of sessions completed; deviations from agreed time in bed; average percentage of patients deviating from bedtime by 15, 30 or 60 min; variability of bedtime and wake‐up time; change in time in bed from pre‐ to post‐assessment. Treatment outcome was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index. Multiple regression models were employed, and insomnia severity was controlled for. Results showed that none of the adherence measures predict insomnia severity. Baseline insomnia severity, dysfunctional thoughts and attitudes about sleep, depression or perfectionism did not predict adherence. The limited variance in the outcome parameter due to most patients benefiting from treatment and the small sample size may explain these findings. Additionally, using objective measures like actigraphy could provide a better understanding of adherence behaviour. Lastly, the presence of perfectionism in patients with insomnia may have mitigated adherence problems in this study.

ORCID iDs

Steinmetz, Lisa, Simon, Laura, Feige, Bernd, Riemann, Dieter, Akram, Umair, Crawford, Megan R. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-1398, Johann, Anna F. and Spiegelhalder, Kai;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)