Does the interaction between partnership status and average progesterone level predict women's preferences for facial masculinity?
DeBruine, Lisa M. and Hahn, Amanda C. and Jones, Benedict C. (2019) Does the interaction between partnership status and average progesterone level predict women's preferences for facial masculinity? Hormones and Behavior, 107. pp. 80-82. ISSN 1095-6867 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.12.004)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: DeBruine_etal_HB_2019_Does_the_interaction_between_partnership_status_and_average_progesterone_level_predict.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript License: Download (173kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Many studies have attempted to identify biological factors that reliably predict individual differences in women's preferences for masculine male faces. Marcinkowska et al. (2018, Hormones & Behavior) recently reported that women's (N = 102) preferences for facial masculinity were predicted by the interaction between their relationship status (partnered versus unpartnered) and average progesterone level. Because previous findings for between-women differences in masculinity preferences have often not replicated well, we attempted to replicate Marcinkowska et al.'s result in an open data set from another recent study that had not tested this hypothesis (Jones et al., 2018, Psychological Science). In this sample of 316 women, we found that facial masculinity preferences were predicted by the interaction between women's relationship status and average progesterone level, consistent with Marcinkowska et al.'s results (data and analysis code are available at https://osf.io/q9szc). Together, these findings suggest that the combined effects of relationship status and average progesterone level may predict facial masculinity preferences relatively reliably.
ORCID iDs
DeBruine, Lisa M., Hahn, Amanda C. and Jones, Benedict C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-0220;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 72526 Dates: DateEvent31 January 2019Published20 December 2018Published Online9 December 2018AcceptedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Psychology Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 02 Jun 2020 10:49 Last modified: 27 Nov 2024 06:12 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/72526