Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Understanding students' experiences in a PE, health and well-being context : a self-determination theory perspective

Gray, Shirley and Mitchell, Fiona and Wang, C. K. John and Robertson, Ashley (2018) Understanding students' experiences in a PE, health and well-being context : a self-determination theory perspective. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 9 (2). pp. 157-173. ISSN 2574-299X

[img] Text (Gray-etal-CSHPE-2018-Understanding-students-experiences-in-a-PE-health-and-well-being-context)
Gray_etal_CSHPE_2018_Understanding_students_experiences_in_a_PE_health_and_well_being_context.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 August 2019.

Download (407kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

    Abstract

    Framed by Self-Determination Theory, this investigation explored student experience as they engaged in their physical education (PE), health and well-being (HWB) curriculum in Scotland for the first time. We aimed to uncover the features of various learning environments that appeared to impact upon student motivation in PE over the period one academic year. We carried out focus group interviews with students from one state secondary school (secondary 1 and 2; ages 12–14) and its feeder primary schools (primary 7; age 11 years) immediately after a selection of PE lessons throughout the year. Furthermore, to provide some additional context for our analysis, the students in each year completed a questionnaire (pre–post) to identify and understand their motivation for PE over time. The results from the interviews indicated that students had a number of positive and negative PE experiences. However, the results from the questionnaire demonstrate that the students’ experiences during the first year of this ‘new’ curriculum had little impact on their motivation for PE. The findings highlight the importance of mixed methods research to provide context-specific account of student experience. This detail may be critical for the development of informed and effective pedagogy that supports student learning, health and well-being.