Disciplinary challenges. Critical perspectives
Murray, G. (2005) Disciplinary challenges. Critical perspectives. ARQ - Architectural Research Quarterly, 9 (1).
Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde authorOfficial URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1359135505000023
Abstract
At the Research Seminar held at the riba on 9 September (see Report, pp13-15), Alan Penn presented the next rae exercise as a creative vehicle by which the diversity of research and architecture could be acknowledged and consolidated as a basis for self-understanding. In principle, this is a good idea. However, it implies something of a common disciplinary understanding, as against the previous regime, where schools pursued different approaches within the loose framework of the riba assessment of design quality.
Creators(s): | Murray, G.; | Item type: | Article |
---|---|
ID code: | 5629 |
Keywords: | architecture education, research, research assessment exercise, Higher Education, Architecture, Architecture , Visual Arts and Performing Arts |
Subjects: | Education > Theory and practice of education > Higher Education Fine Arts > Architecture |
Department: | Faculty of Engineering > Architecture |
Depositing user: | Strathprints Administrator |
Date deposited: | 16 May 2008 |
Last modified: | 01 Jan 2021 08:30 |
URI: | https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/5629 |
Export data: |
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)