Mnemic neglect : selective amnesia of one's faults

Sedikides, Constantine and Green, Jeffrey D. and Saunders, Jo and Skowronski, John J. and Zengel, Bettina (2016) Mnemic neglect : selective amnesia of one's faults. European Review of Social Psychology, 27 (1). pp. 1-62. (

[thumbnail of Sedikides-etal-ERSP-2016-mnemic-neglect-selective-amnesia-of-one's-faults]
Text. Filename: Sedikides_etal_ERSP_2016_mnemic_neglect_selective_amnesia_of_one_s_faults.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (1MB)| Preview


The mnemic neglect model predicts and accounts for selective memory for social feedback as a function of various feedback properties. At the heart of the model is the mnemic neglect effect (MNE), defined as inferior recall for self-threatening feedback compared to other kinds of feedback. The effect emerges both in mundane realism settings and in minimal feedback settings. The effect is presumed to occur in the service of self-protection motivation. Mnemic neglect is pronounced when the feedback poses high levels of self-threat (i.e., can detect accurately one’s weakness), but is lost when self-threat is averted via a self-affirmation manipulation. Mnemic neglect is caused by selfthreatening feedback being processed shallowly and in ways that separate it from stored (positive) self-knowledge. For example, mnemic neglect is lost when feedback processing occurs under cognitive load. The emergence of mnemic neglect is qualified by situational moderators (extent to which one considers their self-conceptions modifiable, receives feedback from a close source, or is primed with improvement-related constructs) and individual differences moderators (anxiety, dysphoria, or defensive pessimism). Finally, the MNE is present in recall, but absent in recognition. Output interference cannot explain this disparity in results, but an inhibitory repression account (e.g., experiential avoidance) can: Repressors show enhanced mnemic neglect. The findings advance research on memory, motivation, and the self.