Design studio teaching practices : between traditional, revolutionary, and virtual models

Tools

Salama, Ashraf M, ed. (2006) Design studio teaching practices : between traditional, revolutionary, and virtual models. Open House International, 31 (3). pp. 1-116. ISSN 0168-2601 (http://www.openhouse-int.com/abdisplay.php?xvolno=...)

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy

Abstract

The process of educating future architects and designers around the world varies dramatically. However, there is one striking similarity – the dominance of the design studio as the main forum for knowledge acquisition and assimilation, and for creative exploration and interaction. Such a setting encompasses intensive cognitive and physical activities, which ultimately result in conceptualizing meaningful environments proposed to accommodate related human activities. The design studio is the primary space where students explore their creative skills that are so prized by the profession; it is the kiln where future architects are molded. It has occupied a central position since architectural education was formalized two centuries ago in France and later in Germany, the rest of Europe, North America, and the rest of the world. My personal experience of the design studio comes principally from being academic, studio educator, and researcher on architectural education and studio teaching practices for over fifteen years. Continuous endeavors have resulted in a number of publications that analyzed traditional studio while probing into the motivations of my colleague educators and allowing for critical examination of studio pedagogy (Salama, 1995; 1996; 1998; 1999; 2002; 2005; 2006). My passion for a continued exploration and investigation of the studio underlying rituals, teaching styles and learning outcomes, design processes and studio projects motivated me to entertain the idea of guest editing this issue and to venture a call for contributions for soliciting visions and experiences on the theme. This initiation was further encouraged and supported by the Editor in Chief – Nicholas Wilkinson. This issue of Open House International-OHI is concerned with the studio pedagogy’s increasing importance within the context of contemporary architectural and design education, a crucial subject that poses itself confidently on the map of current academic research. Twelve papers are included; of them, nine were selected from over 30 submission responses to the call for contributions. These are of Nisha Fernando; Kevin Mitchell, Malika Bose, Eliza Pennypacker, and Tom Yahner; Tasoulla Hadjiyanni; Carlos Balsas; Rabee Reffat; Jeffrey Hou and Min-Jay Kang; Jamal Al Qawasmi; and Jeffrey Haase. Three papers were selected as they won the first three awards of the International Architectural Education Competition entitled "Alternative Educational Ways for Teaching and Learning Architectural Design," which was organized in 2005 by Open House International and the Faculty of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Northern Cyprus. Results were announced in April 2006 and the three winners were Joongsub Kim (1st Prize); Noam Austerlitz & Avigail Sachs, (2nd Prize); and Guita Farivarsadri & Ustun Alsac (3rd Prize).

  • Item type:Article
    ID code:50005
    Dates:
    Date
    Event
    September 2006
    Published
    Notes:See Editorial: Salama, A. M. (2006). Committed Educators Are Reshaping Studio Pedagogy. Open House International, 31, 3, pp. 4-9.
    Subjects:Fine Arts > Architecture
    Education > Education (General)
    Department:Faculty of Engineering > Architecture
    Depositing user: Pure Administrator
    Date deposited:23 Oct 2014 15:30
    Last modified:11 Nov 2024 10:49
    Related URLs:
    URI:https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/50005
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)