Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation : a process evaluation

Scobbie, Lesley and McLean, Donald and Dixon, Diane and Duncan, Edward and Wyke, Sally (2013) Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation : a process evaluation. BMC Health Services Research, 13 (May). 190. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-190)

[thumbnail of 1472_6963_13_190.pdf]
Preview
 PDF. Filename: 1472_6963_13_190.pdf
Final Published Version
Download (653kB)| Preview

Abstract

Goal setting is considered 'best practice' in stroke rehabilitation; however, there is no consensus regarding the key components of goal setting interventions or how they should be optimally delivered in practice. We developed a theory-based goal setting and action planning framework (G-AP) to guide goal setting practice. G-AP has 4 stages: goal negotiation, goal setting, action planning & coping planning and appraisal & feedback. All stages are recorded in a patient-held record. In this study we examined the implementation, acceptability and perceived benefits of G-AP in one community rehabilitation team with people recovering from stroke. G-AP was implemented for 6 months with 23 stroke patients. In-depth interviews with 8 patients and 8 health professionals were analysed thematically to investigate views of its implementation, acceptability and perceived benefits. Case notes of interviewed patients were analysed descriptively to assess the fidelity of G-AP implementation. G-AP was mostly implemented according to protocol with deviations noted at the planning and appraisal and feedback stages. Each stage was felt to make a useful contribution to the overall process; however, in practice, goal negotiation and goal setting merged into one stage and the appraisal and feedback stage included an explicit decision making component. Only two issues were raised regarding G-APs acceptability: (i) health professionals were concerned about the impact of goal non-attainment on patient's well-being (patients did not share their concerns), and (ii) some patients and health professionals found the patient-held record unhelpful. G-AP was felt to have a positive impact on patient goal attainment and professional goal setting practice. Collaborative partnerships between health professionals and patients were apparent throughout the process. G-AP has been perceived as both beneficial and broadly acceptable in one community rehabilitation team; however, implementation of novel aspects of the framework was inconsistent. The regulatory function of goal non-attainment and the importance of creating flexible partnerships with patients have been highlighted. Further development of the G-AP framework, training package and patient held record is required to address the specific issues highlighted by this process evaluation. Further evaluation of G-AP is required across diverse community rehabilitation settings.

ORCID iDs

Scobbie, Lesley, McLean, Donald, Dixon, Diane ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-204X, Duncan, Edward and Wyke, Sally;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)