Acceptability of four intervention components supporting medication adherence in women with breast cancer : a process evaluation of a fractional factorial pilot optimization trial

Green, Sophie M. C. and Rousseau, Nikki and Hall, Louise H. and French, David P. and Graham, Christopher D. and Lloyd, Kelly E. and Collinson, Michelle and Smith, Samuel G. and Ow, Pei Loo and Taylor, Christopher and Howdon, Daniel and Foy, Robbie and Walwyn, Rebecca and Clark, Jane and Parbutt, Catherine and Waller, Jo and Buxton, Jacqueline and Moore, Sally J. L. and Velikova, Galina and Farrin, Amanda and Smith, Samuel G. (2024) Acceptability of four intervention components supporting medication adherence in women with breast cancer : a process evaluation of a fractional factorial pilot optimization trial. Prevention Science. ISSN 1573-6695 (In Press)

[thumbnail of Green-etal-PS-2024-Acceptability-of-four-intervention-components-supporting-medication-adherence-in-women-with-breast-cancer] Text. Filename: Green-etal-PS-2024-Acceptability-of-four-intervention-components-supporting-medication-adherence-in-women-with-breast-cancer.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 January 2099.
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (436kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces mortality in early-stage breast cancer, but adherence is low. We developed a multicomponent intervention to support AET adherence comprising: text messages; information leaflet; acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT); side-effect website. Guided by the multiphase optimization strategy, the intervention components were tested in the ROSETA pilot optimization trial. Our mixed-methods process evaluation investigated component acceptability. Methods: The pilot optimization trial used a 24-1 fractional factorial design. Fifty-two women prescribed AET were randomized to one of eight experimental conditions, containing unique component combinations. An acceptability questionnaire was administered four months post-randomization, and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants further explored acceptability. Assessments were guided by four constructs of the theoretical framework of acceptability; affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and coherence. Quantitative and qualitative findings were triangulated to identify agreements/disagreements. Results: There were high overall acceptability scores (median=14-15/20, range=11-20). There was agreement between the qualitative and quantitative findings when triangulated. Most participants ‘liked’ or ‘strongly liked’ all components, and reported they required low effort to engage in. Between 50% (leaflet) and 65% (SMS) ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ it was clear how each component would help adherence. Perceived effectiveness was mixed, with 35.0% (text messages) to 55.6% (ACT) of participants ‘agreeing’ or ‘strongly agreeing’ that each component would improve their adherence. Interview data provided suggestions for improvements. Conclusion: The four components were acceptable to women with breast cancer, and will be refined. Mixed-methods and triangulation were useful methodological approaches and could be applied in other optimization trial process evaluations.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)