Friends with benefits : how income and peer diffusion combine to create an inequality "trap" in the uptake of low-carbon technologies

Stewart, Fraser (2022) Friends with benefits : how income and peer diffusion combine to create an inequality "trap" in the uptake of low-carbon technologies. Energy Policy, 163. 112832. ISSN 0301-4215 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112832)

[thumbnail of Stewart-EP-2022-how-income-and-peer-diffusion-combine-to-create-an-inequality-trap]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Stewart_EP_2022_how_income_and_peer_diffusion_combine_to_create_an_inequality_trap.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (3MB)| Preview

Abstract

What drives inequalities in the uptake of low-carbon energy technologies? Research has shown that people on higher incomes are significantly more likely to access and benefit from policies designed to boost uptake of clean energy technologies than those with lower incomes, revealing a pervasive inequality issue. Yet little is known about how these inequalities evolve or interact with factors beyond income alone, understanding of which is crucial to designing policies which do not simply replicate or exacerbate existing inequalities going forward. This paper thus advances the novel "feed-in-tariff trap" theory, which posits that, rather than income alone, peer diffusion and socioeconomic factors compound to widen inequalities in the uptake of low-carbon technologies over time. Using a combination of mixed effects and piecewise structural equation modelling, this theory is tested on the adoption of 21,206 household-level wind and solar PV installations across 6976 micro-level data-zones in Scotland between 2009 and 2020 under the UK government feed-in-tariff. It finds crucially that: (1) household solar PV and wind are adopted consistently in higher-income areas, (2) peer diffusion is strongest in higher income areas with high early adoption rates, and (3) socioeconomic conditions are extremely temporally stubborn. Combined, this trifecta creates an inequality "trap", locking the benefits of low-carbon technology subsidies into the same higher income areas and widening the gap in uptake between more affluent and deprived communities as a result. Recommendations are given on how best to address this, with implications for anyone concerned with a "just" transition going forward.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)