Study for the European Commission on 'Possible Ways to Address Digital Sequence Information –Legal and Policy Aspects' : Consultancy project conducted for the European Commission: ENV.F.3/SER/2019/6175145
Morgera, Elisa and Switzer, Stephanie and Geelhoed, Miranda (2019) Study for the European Commission on 'Possible Ways to Address Digital Sequence Information –Legal and Policy Aspects' : Consultancy project conducted for the European Commission: ENV.F.3/SER/2019/6175145. Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law and Governance (SCELG), Glasgow.
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Morgera_etal_2019_Study_for_the_European_Commission_on_Possible_Ways_to_Address_Digital_Sequence_Information.pdf
Final Published Version Download (1MB)| Preview |
Abstract
In 2016, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity ('CBD') recognised for the first time the relevance of, and potential issues surrounding, digital sequence information on genetic resources ('DSI') for the achievement of the CBD's three objectives: namely, the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components and, notably, the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources. In light of the need for a coordinated and non-duplicative approach, the issue was simultaneously raised by the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meetings of the Parties ('COP-MOP') to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing ('the Nagoya Protocol'). An Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group (AHTEG) was established and multiple studies have been undertaken or are currently being conducted to shed light on the highly technical and complex issue of how DSI relates to the scope and workings of the international regime on access and benefit-sharing ('ABS). DSI has been debated during the 2018 COP and COP-MOP, and it is expected that DSI will remain a critical topic at the CBD COP15 as well as in other international fora. Specifically, DSI is also being discussed under the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework (PIP Framework) of the World Health Organisation (WHO), the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) as well as current UN negotiations for a legally binding instrument on marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ).
ORCID iDs
Morgera, Elisa ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-8784, Switzer, Stephanie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-988X and Geelhoed, Miranda ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0802-8564;-
-
Item type: Report ID code: 75768 Dates: DateEvent31 December 2019PublishedSubjects: Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > Environmental Sciences Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Law School > Law
Strategic Research Themes > Ocean, Air and Space
Strategic Research Themes > Society and PolicyDepositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 11 Mar 2021 15:01 Last modified: 21 Dec 2024 01:30 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/75768