Comparison of the ranges of uncertainty captured in different seismic-hazard studies

Tools

Douglas, John and Ulrich, Thomas and Bertil, Didier and Rey, Julien (2014) Comparison of the ranges of uncertainty captured in different seismic-hazard studies. Seismological Research Letters, 85 (5). pp. 977-985. ISSN 0895-0695 (https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140084)

[thumbnail of Douglas-etal-SRL-2014-Comparison-of-the-ranges-of-uncertainty-captured-in-different-seismic]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Douglas_etal_SRL_2014_Comparison_of_the_ranges_of_uncertainty_captured_in_different_seismic.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Download (449kB)| Preview

Abstract

The inclusion of epistemic uncertainties, generally via logic trees (Kulkarni et al., 1984), within probabilistic seismic‐hazard assessments (PSHAs) is becoming standard for all types of studies (commercial, governmental, or research; site specific, national, regional, or global). Consequently many studies publish expected ground motions for a given annual frequency of exceedance (AFE) or return period derived from the hazard curves for the mean, median, and various fractiles (percentiles).

ORCID iDs

Douglas, John ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-0060, Ulrich, Thomas, Bertil, Didier and Rey, Julien;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)