Industry 5 and the human in human-centric manufacturing

Briken, Kendra and Moore, Jed and Scholarios, Dora and Rose, Emily and Sherlock, Andrew (2023) Industry 5 and the human in human-centric manufacturing. Sensors, 23 (14). 6416. ISSN 1424-8220 (https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146416)

[thumbnail of Briken-etal-Sensors-2023-Industry-5-and-the-human-in-human-centric-manufacturing]
Preview
Text. Filename: Briken_etal_Sensors_2023_Industry_5_and_the_human_in_human_centric_manufacturing.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (768kB)| Preview

Abstract

Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and enabling data collection for system-level technologies. Concerns for human labour working in I4 environments (e.g., health and safety, data generation and extraction) are acknowledged by Industry 5 (I5), an update of I4 which promises greater attention to human–machine relations through a values-driven approach to collaboration and co-design. This article explores how engineering experts integrate values promoted by policy-makers into both their thinking about the human in their work and in their writing. This paper demonstrates a novel interdisciplinary approach in which an awareness of different disciplinary epistemic values associated with humans and work guides a systematic literature review and interpretive coding of practice-focussed engineering papers. Findings demonstrate evidence of an I5 human-centric approach: a high value for employees as “end-users” of innovative systems in manufacturing; and an increase in output addressing human activity in modelling and the technologies available to address this concern. However, epistemic publishing practices show that efforts to increase the effectiveness of manufacturing systems often neglect worker voice.