Techniques for contact-based structural health monitoring with multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles

Watson, Robert and Zhao, Taiyi and Zhang, Dayi and Kamel, Mina and MacLeod, Charles and Dobie, Gordon and Bolton, Gary and Joly, Antoine and Pierce, S. Gareth and Nieto, Juan; Saman, Farhangdoust and Guemes, Alfredo and Chang, Fu-Kuo, eds. (2022) Techniques for contact-based structural health monitoring with multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Destech Publications, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp. 21-28. ISBN 9781605956879

[thumbnail of Watson-etal-IWSHM-2021-structural-health-monitoring-with-multirotor-unmanned-aerial-vehicles]
Preview
Text. Filename: Watson_etal_IWSHM_2021_structural_health_monitoring_with_multirotor_unmanned_aerial_vehicles.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has become commonplace across civil and energy generation applications with hazardous or time-consuming inspection processes. Expanding upon surface screening offered by non-contact remote visual inspection UAVs, systems are now beginning to incorporate contact-based Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) transducers to detect and monitor incipient sub-surface flaws. However, challenges to environmental interaction using conventional multirotor platform dynamics amid aerodynamic disturbances have frustrated efforts for stable and repeatable sensor placement. Herein, two distinct UAV systems are evaluated as a means to overcome these challenges. The first utilizes vectored thrust with a tri-copter layout. It may dynamically re-orient dual-axis tilting propellers to directly effect interaction force and deploy dry-coupled ultrasonic thickness measurement across omnidirectional targets. In static point and rolling scan measurement, laboratory tests demonstrate mean absolute error below 0.1 mm and 0.3 mm, respectively. The second UAV uses rigidly affixed multi-directional propellers to reverse and redirect its net thrust. Landing atop cylindrical structures it may crawl around their circumference, supporting itself without magnetic or vacuum adhesion. Arbitrary static position is maintained to within a mean deviation of 0.7 mm. Lastly, comparative discussion of each system informs strategies for further development of contact-based aerial SHM and its adoption to industrial practice.