Does the interaction between cortisol and testosterone predict men's facial attractiveness?
Kandrik, Michal and Hahn, Amanda C. and Han, Chengyang and Wincenciak, Joanna and Fisher, Claire I. and DeBruine, Lisa M. and Jones, Benedict C. (2017) Does the interaction between cortisol and testosterone predict men's facial attractiveness? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3 (4). pp. 275-281. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0064-1)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Kandrik_etal_AHBP_2017_Does_the_interaction_between_cortisol_and_testosterone_predict_mens_facial_attractiveness.pdf
Final Published Version License: Download (429kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Although some researchers have suggested that the interaction between cortisol and testosterone predicts ratings of men’s facial attractiveness, evidence for this pattern of results is equivocal. Consequently, the current study tested for a correlation between men’s facial attractiveness and the interaction between their cortisol and testosterone levels. We also tested for corresponding relationships between the interaction between cortisol and testosterone and ratings of men’s facial health and dominance (perceived traits that are correlated with facial attractiveness in men). We found no evidence that ratings of either facial attractiveness or health were correlated with the interaction between cortisol and testosterone. Some analyses suggested that the interaction between cortisol and testosterone levels may predict ratings of men’s facial dominance, however, with testosterone being more closely related to facial dominance ratings among men with higher cortisol. Our results suggest that the relationship between men’s facial attractiveness and the interaction between cortisol and testosterone is not robust.
ORCID iDs
Kandrik, Michal, Hahn, Amanda C., Han, Chengyang, Wincenciak, Joanna, Fisher, Claire I., DeBruine, Lisa M. and Jones, Benedict C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-0220;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 72742 Dates: DateEvent31 December 2017Published30 March 2017Published Online16 March 2017AcceptedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Psychology Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 16 Jun 2020 10:05 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 12:41 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/72742