Selling intra-curricular clinical legal education

Combe, Malcolm M. (2014) Selling intra-curricular clinical legal education. The Law Teacher, 48 (3). pp. 281-295. ISSN 0306-9400 (https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2014.965950)

[thumbnail of Combe-TLT2014-Selling-intra-curricular-clinical-legal-education]
Preview
Text. Filename: Combe_TLT2014_Selling_intra_curricular_clinical_legal_education.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (774kB)| Preview

Abstract

A well-run student law clinic can bring benefits to its local community and to the students who participate in the initiative. The many shapes and sizes of law clinics mean that the model adopted can have an impact on the mix of community benefit and student benefit that any particular project brings. One key potential difference between clinical programmes is whether an intra- or extra-curricular model is employed, with the question of whether one is preferable to the other being a difficult one to contend with when considered in the light of the (often equally valid) competing interests that exist. This article makes a case for the practical and tactical decision of introducing an academic, credit-bearing element to student clinical legal activity, drawing on a literature review of clinical legal education (CLE) sources, lessons from experiences of CLE and survey data from volunteers at the Aberdeen Law Project, the University of Aberdeen’s student founded and, until recently, extra-curricular organisation.

ORCID iDs

Combe, Malcolm M. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-9150;