Picture child's feet next to pens, pencils and paper

Open Access research that is helping to improve educational outcomes for children

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Education, including those researching educational and social practices in curricular subjects. Research in this area seeks to understand the complex influences that increase curricula capacity and engagement by studying how curriculum practices relate to cultural, intellectual and social practices in and out of schools and nurseries.

Research at the School of Education also spans a number of other areas, including inclusive pedagogy, philosophy of education, health and wellbeing within health-related aspects of education (e.g. physical education and sport pedagogy, autism and technology, counselling education, and pedagogies for mental and emotional health), languages education, and other areas.

Explore Open Access education research. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

A hitchhiker's guide to assessing young people's motor competence : deciding what method to use

Bardid, Farid and Vannozzi, Giuseppe and Logan, Samuel W. and Hardy, Louise L. and Barnett, Lisa M. (2018) A hitchhiker's guide to assessing young people's motor competence : deciding what method to use. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. ISSN 1878-1861

[img] Text (Bardid-etal-JSMS2018-A-hitchhikers-guide-to-assessing-young-peoples-motor-competence)
Bardid_etal_JSMS2018_A_hitchhikers_guide_to_assessing_young_peoples_motor_competence.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 August 2019.
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo

Download (641kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Objectives: To offer a user’s guide to select appropriate measures of motor competence for children and adolescents. Design: Expert consensus among a working group of the International Motor Development Research Consortium (I-MDRC). Methods: The guide provides information on objective (motion devices and direct observation) and subjective (self-reports and proxy reports) methods for assessing motor competence among children and adolescents. Key characteristics (age group, sample size, delivery mode, assessment time, data output, data processing) as well as limitations and practical considerations (e.g., cost, sources of error) with regard to each method are included in this paper. We do not recommend specific instruments, rather a guide to assist researchers and practitioners interested in assessing children’s motor competence. Results: A decision flow chart was developed to support practitioners and researchers in selecting appropriate methods for measuring motor competence in young people. Real-life scenarios are presented to illustrate the use of different methods in research and practice. Conclusions: Policy makers, practitioners and researchers should consider the strengths and limitations of each method when measuring motor competence in children and adolescents. This will allow them to choose the most appropriate instrument(s) that meets their needs.