Patient preference as a predictor of outcomes in a pilot trial of person-centred counselling versus low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy for persistent sub-threshold and mild depression

Tools

Cooper, Mick and Messow, Claudia-Martina and McConnachie, Alex and Freire, Elizabeth and Elliott, Robert and Heard, Deborah and Williams, Christopher and Morrison, Jill (2018) Patient preference as a predictor of outcomes in a pilot trial of person-centred counselling versus low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy for persistent sub-threshold and mild depression. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 31 (4). ISSN 1469-3674 (https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2017.1329708)

[thumbnail of Cooper-etal-CPQ-2017-Patient-preference-as-a-predictor-of-outcomes-in-a-pilot-trial]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Cooper_etal_CPQ_2017_Patient_preference_as_a_predictor_of_outcomes_in_a_pilot_trial.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Download (859kB)| Preview

Abstract

The aim of this analysis was to explore whether pre-treatment intervention preferences were related to outcomes for patients with persistent sub-threshold and mild depression who received one of two treatment types. Thirty-six patients took part in a two-arm, parallel group, pilot randomized controlled trial that compared short term (3 month and 6 month) outcomes of person-centred counselling (PCC) compared with low-intensity, CBT-based guided self-help (LICBT). Patient preferences for the two interventions were assessed at baseline assessment, and analysed as two independent linear variables (pro-PCC, pro-LICBT). Eight out of 30 interactions between baseline treatment preferences and treatment type were found to be significant at the p < .05 level. All were in the predicted direction, with patients who showed a stronger preference for a treatment achieving better outcomes in that treatment compared with the alternative. However, pro-LICBT was a stronger predictor of outcomes than pro-PCC. The findings provide preliminary support that treatment preferences should be taken into account when providing interventions for patients with persistent sub-threshold and mild depression. It is recommended that further research analyses preferences for different treatment types as independent variables, and examines preferences for format of treatment (e.g. guided self-help vs. face-to-face).

ORCID iDs

Cooper, Mick, Messow, Claudia-Martina, McConnachie, Alex, Freire, Elizabeth, Elliott, Robert ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-3397, Heard, Deborah, Williams, Christopher and Morrison, Jill;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)