A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition : design as search and exploration
Hay, Laura and Duffy, Alex H. B. and McTeague, Chris and Pidgeon, Laura M. and Vuletic, Tijana and Grealy, Madeleine (2017) A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition : design as search and exploration. Design Science, 3. e10. (https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Hay_etal_DJ2017_A_systematic_review_of_protocol_studies_on_conceptual_design_cognition.pdf
Final Published Version License: Download (1MB)| Preview |
Abstract
This paper reports findings from the first systematic review of protocol studies focusing specifically on conceptual design cognition, aiming to answer the following research question: What is our current understanding of the cognitive processes involved in conceptual design tasks carried out by individual designers? We reviewed 47 studies on architectural design, engineering design, and product design engineering. This paper reports 24 cognitive processes investigated in a subset of 33 studies aligning with two viewpoints on the nature of designing: (V1) design as search (10 processes, 41.7%); and (V2) design as exploration (14 processes, 58.3%). Studies on search focused on solution search and problem structuring, considered to involve: long term memory retrieval; working memory; and a range of operators. Reasoning processes are also examined. Studies on exploration investigated: (i) co-evolutionary design; (ii) visual reasoning processes; (iii) cognitive actions; and (iv) unexpected discovery and situated requirements invention. Overall, considerable conceptual and terminological differences were observed among the studies. Nonetheless, a common focus on memory, semantic, associative, visual perceptual, and mental imagery processes was observed to an extent. We suggest three challenges for future research to advance the field: (i) developing general models and theories; (ii) testing protocol study findings using objective methods conducive to larger samples; and (iii) developing a shared ontology of cognitive processes in conceptual design.
ORCID iDs
Hay, Laura ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-9463, Duffy, Alex H. B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-4314, McTeague, Chris ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-3245, Pidgeon, Laura M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-1434, Vuletic, Tijana ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-9087 and Grealy, Madeleine ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2823-8841;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 60767 Dates: DateEvent20 July 2017Published23 May 2017Accepted10 June 2016SubmittedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology
Technology > Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) > Engineering designDepartment: Faculty of Engineering > Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Psychology
Strategic Research Themes > Health and WellbeingDepositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 25 May 2017 08:54 Last modified: 21 Nov 2024 01:11 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/60767