Increasing the quality of seismic interpretation

Macrae, Euan J. and Bond, Clare E. and Shipton, Zoe K. and Lunn, Rebecca J. (2016) Increasing the quality of seismic interpretation. Interpretation, 4 (3). T395-T402.

[img]
Preview
Text (Macrae-etal-Interpretation2016-Increasing-the-quality-of-seismic-interpretation)
Macrae_etal_Interpretation2016_Increasing_the_quality_of_seismic_interpretation.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (2MB)| Preview

    Abstract

    Geological models are based on the interpretation of spatially sparse and limited resolution datasets. Non-unique interpretations often exist, resulting in commercial, safety and environmental risk. We survey 444 experienced geoscientists to assess the validity of their interpretations of a seismic section for which multiple concepts honor the data. The most statistically significant factor in improving interpretation was writing about geological time. A randomized controlled trial identified for the first time a significant causal link between considering the temporal evolution of an interpretation, a type of writing about geological time, and increased interpretation quality. These results have important implications for interpreting geological data and communicating uncertainty in models.