Reply to comment on "Suburban watershed nitrogen retention: Estimating the effectiveness of stormwater management structures" by Koch et al. (Elem Sci Anth 3:000063, July 2015)

Koch, Benjamin J. and Filoso, Solange and Cooke, Roger M. and Hosen, Jacob D. and Colson, Abigail R. and Febria, Catherine M. and Palmer, Margaret A. (2015) Reply to comment on "Suburban watershed nitrogen retention: Estimating the effectiveness of stormwater management structures" by Koch et al. (Elem Sci Anth 3:000063, July 2015). Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 3. p. 79. ISSN 2325-1026 (https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000079)

[thumbnail of Koch-etal-Elementa-2015-Reply-to-comment-on-Suburban-watershed-nitrogen-retention-estimating-the-effectiveness-of-stormwater]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Koch_etal_Elementa_2015_Reply_to_comment_on_Suburban_watershed_nitrogen_retention_estimating_the_effectiveness_of_stormwater.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (112kB)| Preview

Abstract

We reply to a comment on our recent structured expert judgment analysis of stormwater nitrogen retention in suburban watersheds. Low relief, permeable soils, a dynamic stream channel, and subsurface flows characterize many lowland Coastal Plain watersheds. These features result in unique catchment hydrology, limit the precision of streamflow measurements, and challenge the assumptions for calculating runoff from rainfall and catchment area. We reiterate that the paucity of high-resolution nitrogen loading data for Chesapeake Bay watersheds warrants greater investment in long-term empirical studies of suburban watershed nutrient budgets for this region.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)