Looking both ways
Stiles, William B. and Hill, Clara E. and Elliott, Robert (2015) Looking both ways. Psychotherapy Research, 25 (3). pp. 282-293. ISSN 1050-3307 (https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.981681)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Stiles_etal_PR_2015_Looking_both_ways.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (241kB)| Preview |
Abstract
On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the journal, Psychotherapy Research, three former editors first look back at: (i) the controversial persistence of the Dodo verdict (i.e., the observation that all bona fide therapies seem equally effective); (ii) the connection between process and outcome; (iii) the move toward methodological pluralism; and (iv) the politicization of the field around evidence-based practice and treatment guidelines. We then look forward to the next 25 years, suggesting that it would be promising to focus on three areas: (i) systematic theory-building research; (ii) renewed attention to fine-grained study of therapist techniques; and (iii) politically expedient research on the outcomes of marginalized or emerging therapies.
ORCID iDs
Stiles, William B., Hill, Clara E. and Elliott, Robert ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-3397;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 53595 Dates: DateEvent15 May 2015Published27 November 2014Published Online20 October 2014AcceptedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Counselling Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 06 Jul 2015 10:22 Last modified: 02 Dec 2024 01:16 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/53595