Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis : methodology and experimental results'

Tools

Ganguly, Taposhri and Wilson, Kevin and Quigley, John and Cooke, Roger and Babuscia, Alessandra and Cheung, Kar-Ming (2014) Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis : methodology and experimental results'. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 177 (4). pp. 981-985. ISSN 0964-1998 (https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12070)

[thumbnail of Letter_to_Editor_JRSS_6]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Letter_to_Editor_JRSS_6.pdf
Preprint
Download (209kB)| Preview
[thumbnail of Letter_to_Editor_JRSS_A_Revision]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Letter_to_Editor_JRSS_A_Revision.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Download (232kB)| Preview

Abstract

This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)

ORCID iDs

Ganguly, Taposhri ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-4331, Wilson, Kevin, Quigley, John ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-8470, Cooke, Roger, Babuscia, Alessandra and Cheung, Kar-Ming;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)