Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis : methodology and experimental results'
Ganguly, Taposhri and Wilson, Kevin and Quigley, John and Cooke, Roger and Babuscia, Alessandra and Cheung, Kar-Ming (2014) Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis : methodology and experimental results'. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 177 (4). pp. 981-985. ISSN 0964-1998 (https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12070)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Letter_to_Editor_JRSS_6.pdf
Preprint Download (209kB)| Preview |
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Letter_to_Editor_JRSS_A_Revision.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (232kB)| Preview |
Abstract
This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)
ORCID iDs
Ganguly, Taposhri ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-4331, Wilson, Kevin, Quigley, John ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-8470, Cooke, Roger, Babuscia, Alessandra and Cheung, Kar-Ming;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 49018 Dates: DateEvent1 October 2014Published15 July 2014Published Online19 March 2014AcceptedSubjects: Social Sciences > Industries. Land use. Labor > Risk Management
Technology > Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)Department: Strathclyde Business School > Management Science Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 08 Aug 2014 11:14 Last modified: 24 Oct 2024 00:25 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/49018