Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

The relative influence of leading questions and negative feedback on response change on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (2) : implications for forensic interviewing

Baxter, James and Charles, Kathy and Martin, Michelle and McGroarty, Allan (2012) The relative influence of leading questions and negative feedback on response change on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (2) : implications for forensic interviewing. Psychology Crime and Law, 19 (3). pp. 277-285. ISSN 1068-316X

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

The ‘Shift’ or response change measure of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 &2) is assumed primarily to indicate acceptance of the negative feedback component of the GSS procedure. Using an adapted version of the question set which bears on the GSS 2 narrative, this study systematically varied the pressurising influences of the GSS 2 specifically to test this assumption. In four conditions, negative and neutral feedback were administered either with leading or non-leading questions. Varying type of feedback to participants resulted in significant differences in Shift scores. In line with the theorised bases of the scales, the leading questions component of the GSS was found to have no significant independent effect on Shift and to be no more effective that non-leading questions in influencing this measure. The study also lent support to two previous studies which have shown that negative feedback in the absence of leading questions alters average response change to a reliable degree (10%), suggesting a useful norm for adapted versions of the GSS procedure. It is argued that the influence of feedback on response change in interviews merits more attention from researchers than it has previously received.