Urban versus rural differences in meeting 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines among 3-4-year-olds : an analysis of SUNRISE pilot study data from 10 low- and middle-income countries
Nusurupia, Jackline and Florindo, Alex and Okely, Anthony and Pham, Bang and Draper, Catherine and Koh, Denise and Guan, Hongyan and Tang, Hong and Reilly, John and Sultoni, Kuston and Leyna, Germana H. and Tremblay, Mark and Hossain, Mohammad S. and Munambah, Nyaradzai and Wickramasinghe, Pujitha and Janssen, Xanne (2024) Urban versus rural differences in meeting 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines among 3-4-year-olds : an analysis of SUNRISE pilot study data from 10 low- and middle-income countries. Child: Care, Health and Development, 50 (6). ISSN 0305-1862 (https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.70008)
Text.
Filename: Nusurupia-etal-CCHD-2024-Urban-versus-rural-differences-in-meeting-24-hour-movement-behaviour-guidelines.docx
Accepted Author Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 January 2099. Download (80kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Background: Insufficient physical activity, excessive screen time, and short sleep duration among young children are global public health concerns, however, data on prevalence of meeting World Health Organization 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines for 3–4-year-olds children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are limited, and it is unknown whether urbanisation is related to young children’s movement behaviours. The present study examined differences in prevalence of meeting 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines among 3–4-year-old children living in urban vs rural settings in LMICs. Methods: The SUNRISE Study recruited 429, 3–4-year-old child/parent dyads from 10 LMICs. Children wore activPALTM accelerometers continuously for at least 48 hours to assess their physical activity and sleep duration. Screen time and time spent restrained were assessed via parent questionnaire. Differences in prevalence of meeting guidelines between urban and rural dwelling children were examined using chi-square tests. Results: Physical activity guidelines were met by 17% of children (14% urban vs 18% rural), sleep guidelines by 57% (61% urban vs 54% rural), screen time guidelines by 50% (50% urban vs 50% rural), restrained guidelines by 84% (81% urban vs 86 % rural), and all guidelines combined by 4% (4% urban vs 4% rural). We found no significant differences in meeting the guidelines between urban and rural areas. Conclusions: Only a small proportion of children in both rural and urban settings met the WHO 24-hour movement guidelines. Strategies to improve movement behaviours in LMICs should consider including both rural and urban settings.
ORCID iDs
Nusurupia, Jackline, Florindo, Alex, Okely, Anthony, Pham, Bang, Draper, Catherine, Koh, Denise, Guan, Hongyan, Tang, Hong, Reilly, John ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-5471, Sultoni, Kuston, Leyna, Germana H., Tremblay, Mark, Hossain, Mohammad S., Munambah, Nyaradzai, Wickramasinghe, Pujitha and Janssen, Xanne ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-0792;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 91090 Dates: DateEvent1 November 2024Published25 October 2024AcceptedSubjects: Medicine > Pediatrics > Child Health. Child health services Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Physical Activity for Health Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 07 Nov 2024 10:52 Last modified: 21 Nov 2024 09:28 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/91090