Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip : does age affect outcomes?

Kennedy, John W. and Sinnerton, Robert and Jeyakumar, Gowsikan and Kane, Nicholas and Young, David and Meek, R. M. D. (2024) Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip : does age affect outcomes? The Bone & Joint Journal, 106-B (8). pp. 802-807. ISSN 2049-4394 (https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b8.bjj-2023-1...)

[thumbnail of Kennedy-et-al-BJJ-2024-Periprosthetic-joint-infection-of-the-hip] Text. Filename: Kennedy-et-al-BJJ-2024-Periprosthetic-joint-infection-of-the-hip.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 August 2025.
License: Strathprints license 1.0
Download (824kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Aims: The number of revision arthroplasties being performed in the elderly is expected to rise, including revision for infection. The primary aim of this study was to measure the treatment success rate for octogenarians undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to a younger cohort. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality. Methods: Patients undergoing one- or two-stage revision of a primary THA for PJI between January 2008 and January 2021 were identified. Age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), McPherson systemic host grade, and causative organism were collated for all patients. PJI was classified as 'confirmed', 'likely', or 'unlikely' according to the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria. Primary outcomes were complications, reoperation, re-revision, and successful treatment of PJI. A total of 37 patients aged 80 years or older and 120 patients aged under 80 years were identified. The octogenarian group had a significantly lower BMI and significantly higher CCI and McPherson systemic host grades compared to the younger cohort. Results: The majority of patients were planned to undergo two-stage revision, although a significantly higher proportion of the octogenarians did not proceed with the second stage (38.7% (n = 12) vs 14.8% (n = 16); p = 0.003). Although there was some evidence of a lower complication rate in the younger cohort, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.065). No significant difference in reoperation (21.6% (n = 8) vs 25.0% (n = 30); p = 0.675) or re-revision rate (8.1% (n = 3) vs 16.7% (n = 20); p = 0.288) was identified between the groups. There was no difference in treatment success between groups (octogenarian 89.2% (n = 33) vs control 82.5% (n = 99); p = 0.444). Conclusion: When compared to a younger cohort, octogenarians did not show a significant difference in complication, re-revision, or treatment success rates. However, given they are less likely to be eligible to proceed with second stage revision, consideration should be given to either single-stage revision or use of an articulated spacer to maximize functional outcomes.

ORCID iDs

Kennedy, John W., Sinnerton, Robert, Jeyakumar, Gowsikan, Kane, Nicholas, Young, David ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-0513 and Meek, R. M. D.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)