Is it feasible to develop a supervised learning algorithm incorporating spinopelvic mobility to predict impingement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? : A proof-of-concept study

Fontalis, Andreas and Zhao, Baixiang and Mancino, Fabio and Putzeys, Pierre and Vanspauwen, Thomas and Glod, Fabrice and Plastow, Ricci and Mazomenos, Evangelos and Haddad, Fares (2024) Is it feasible to develop a supervised learning algorithm incorporating spinopelvic mobility to predict impingement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? : A proof-of-concept study. Bone & Joint Open, 5 (8). 671 - 680. (https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0020...)

[thumbnail of Fontalis-etal-BJO-2024-Is-it-feasible-to-develop-a-supervised-learning-algorithm-incorporating-spinopelvic-mobility-to-predict-impingement]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Fontalis-etal-BJO-2024-Is-it-feasible-to-develop-a-supervised-learning-algorithm-incorporating-spinopelvic-mobility-to-predict-impingement.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo
Download (932kB)| Preview

Abstract

Aims Precise implant positioning, tailored to individual spinopelvic biomechanics and phenotype, is paramount for stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a few studies on instability prediction, there is a notable gap in research utilizing artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of our pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing an AI algorithm tailored to individual spinopelvic mechanics and patient phenotype for predicting impingement. Methods This international, multicentre prospective cohort study across two centres encompassed 157 adults undergoing primary robotic arm-assisted THA. Impingement during specific flexion and extension stances was identified using the virtual range of motion (ROM) tool of the robotic software. The primary AI model, the Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LGBM), used tabular data to predict impingement presence, direction (flexion or extension), and type. A secondary model integrating tabular data with plain anteroposterior pelvis radiographs was evaluated to assess for any potential enhancement in prediction accuracy. Results We identified nine predictors from an analysis of baseline spinopelvic characteristics and surgical planning parameters. Using fivefold cross-validation, the LGBM achieved 70.2% impingement prediction accuracy. With impingement data, the LGBM estimated direction with 85% accuracy, while the support vector machine (SVM) determined impingement type with 72.9% accuracy. After integrating imaging data with a multilayer perceptron (tabular) and a convolutional neural network (radiograph), the LGBM’s prediction was 68.1%. Both combined and LGBM-only had similar impingement direction prediction rates (around 84.5%). Conclusion This study is a pioneering effort in leveraging AI for impingement prediction in THA, utilizing a comprehensive, real-world clinical dataset. Our machine-learning algorithm demonstrated promising accuracy in predicting impingement, its type, and direction. While the addition of imaging data to our deep-learning algorithm did not boost accuracy, the potential for refined annotations, such as landmark markings, offers avenues for future enhancement. Prior to clinical integration, external validation and larger-scale testing of this algorithm are essential.

ORCID iDs

Fontalis, Andreas, Zhao, Baixiang ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3855-8718, Mancino, Fabio, Putzeys, Pierre, Vanspauwen, Thomas, Glod, Fabrice, Plastow, Ricci, Mazomenos, Evangelos and Haddad, Fares;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)