The effect of 12 weeks of combined upper- and lower-body high-intensity interval training on muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults

Tools

Hurst, Christopher and Weston, Kathryn L. and Weston, Matthew (2019) The effect of 12 weeks of combined upper- and lower-body high-intensity interval training on muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 31 (5). pp. 661-671. ISSN 1594-0667 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-1015-9)

[thumbnail of Hurst-etal-ACER-2019-The-effect-of-12-weeks-of-combined-upper-and-lower-body-high-intensity-interval-training]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Hurst_etal_ACER_2019_The_effect_of_12_weeks_of_combined_upper_and_lower_body_high_intensity_interval_training.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (724kB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: High-intensity interval training (HIT) can impact cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness simultaneously, yet protocols typically focus on lower-body exercise. For older adults however, performing activities of daily living requires upper- and lower-body fitness. Aims: To assess the effects of combined upper- and lower-body HIT on fitness in adults aged > 50 years. Methods: Thirty-six adults (50–81 years; 21 male) were assigned via minimisation to either HIT (n = 18) or a no-exercise control group (CON, n = 18) following baseline assessment of leg extensor muscle power, handgrip strength, cardiorespiratory fitness (predicted VO 2max ) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HIT group completed two training sessions per week for 12-weeks, performing a combination of upper-, lower- and full-body exercises using a novel hydraulic resistance ergometer. Data were analysed via ANCOVA with probabilistic inferences made about the clinical relevance of observed effects. Results: All participants completed the intervention with mean (82 ± 6%HR max ) and peak (89 ± 6%HR max ) exercise heart rates confirming a high-intensity training stimulus. Compared with CON, HIT showed possibly small beneficial effects for dominant leg power (10.5%; 90% confidence interval 2.4–19.4%), non-dominant leg power (9.4%; 3.3–16.0%) and non-dominant handgrip strength (6.3%; 1.2–11.5%) while the intervention effect was likely trivial (5.9%; 0.5–11.5%) for dominant handgrip strength. There was a likely small beneficial effect for predicted VO 2max (8.4%; 1.8–15.4%) and small-moderate improvements across several domains of HRQoL. Conclusion: Combined upper- and lower-body HIT has small clinically relevant beneficial effects on muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults.

ORCID iDs

Hurst, Christopher, Weston, Kathryn L. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-6389 and Weston, Matthew;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)