Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES) : a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Tools

Goldstein, Laura H. and Robinson, Emily J and Mellers, John D. C. and Stone, Jon and Carson, Alan and Reuber, Markus and Medford, Nick and McCrone, Paul and Murray, Joanna and Richardson, Mark P and Pilecka, Izabela and Eastwood, Carole and Moore, Michele and Mosweu, Iris and Perdue, Iain and Landau, Sabine and Chalder, Trudie and Graham, Christopher Darryl (2020) Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES) : a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7 (6). pp. 491-505. ISSN 2215-0366 (https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30128-0)

[thumbnail of Goldstein-etal-LP2020-Cognitive-behavioural-therapy-adults-dissociative-seizures-CODES-pragmatic-multicentre-andomised-controlled-trial]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Goldstein_etal_LP2020_Cognitive_behavioural_therapy_adults_dissociative_seizures_CODES_pragmatic_multicentre_andomised_controlled_trial.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: Dissociative seizures are paroxysmal events resembling epilepsy or syncope with characteristic features that allow them to be distinguished from other medical conditions. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) plus standardised medical care with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of dissociative seizure frequency. Methods: In this pragmatic, parallel-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial, we initially recruited participants at 27 neurology or epilepsy services in England, Scotland, and Wales. Adults (≥18 years) who had dissociative seizures in the previous 8 weeks and no epileptic seizures in the previous 12 months were subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) from 17 liaison or neuropsychiatry services following psychiatric assessment, to receive standardised medical care or CBT plus standardised medical care, using a web-based system. Randomisation was stratified by neuropsychiatry or liaison psychiatry recruitment site. The trial manager, chief investigator, all treating clinicians, and patients were aware of treatment allocation, but outcome data collectors and trial statisticians were unaware of treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome was monthly dissociative seizure frequency (ie, frequency in the previous 4 weeks) assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes assessed at 12 months were: seizure severity (intensity) and bothersomeness; longest period of seizure freedom in the previous 6 months; complete seizure freedom in the previous 3 months; a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline; changes in dissociative seizures (rated by others); health-related quality of life; psychosocial functioning; psychiatric symptoms, psychological distress, and somatic symptom burden; and clinical impression of improvement and satisfaction. p values and statistical significance for outcomes were reported without correction for multiple comparisons as per our protocol. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population with multiple imputation for missing observations. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN05681227, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325544. Findings: Between Jan 16, 2015, and May 31, 2017, we randomly assigned 368 patients to receive CBT plus standardised medical care (n=186) or standardised medical care alone (n=182); of whom 313 had primary outcome data at 12 months (156 [84%] of 186 patients in the CBT plus standardised medical care group and 157 [86%] of 182 patients in the standardised medical care group). At 12 months, no significant difference in monthly dissociative seizure frequency was identified between the groups (median 4 seizures [IQR 0–20] in the CBT plus standardised medical care group vs 7 seizures [1–35] in the standardised medical care group; estimated incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·56–1·09]; p=0·144). Dissociative seizures were rated as less bothersome in the CBT plus standardised medical care group than the standardised medical care group (estimated mean difference −0·53 [95% CI −0·97 to −0·08]; p=0·020). The CBT plus standardised medical care group had a longer period of dissociative seizure freedom in the previous 6 months (estimated IRR 1·64 [95% CI 1·22 to 2·20]; p=0·001), reported better health-related quality of life on the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Level Health Today visual analogue scale (estimated mean difference 6·16 [95% CI 1·48 to 10·84]; p=0·010), less impairment in psychosocial functioning on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (estimated mean difference −4·12 [95% CI −6·35 to −1·89]; p Interpretation: CBT plus standardised medical care had no statistically significant advantage compared with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of monthly seizures. However, improvements were observed in a number of clinically relevant secondary outcomes following CBT plus standardised medical care when compared with standardised medical care alone. Thus, adults with dissociative seizures might benefit from the addition of dissociative seizure-specific CBT to specialist care from neurologists and psychiatrists. Future work is needed to identify patients who would benefit most from a dissociative seizure-specific CBT approach.

ORCID iDs

Goldstein, Laura H., Robinson, Emily J, Mellers, John D. C., Stone, Jon, Carson, Alan, Reuber, Markus, Medford, Nick, McCrone, Paul, Murray, Joanna, Richardson, Mark P, Pilecka, Izabela, Eastwood, Carole, Moore, Michele, Mosweu, Iris, Perdue, Iain, Landau, Sabine, Chalder, Trudie and Graham, Christopher Darryl ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-9154;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)