Constructing practices of engagement with users and communities : comparing emergent state-led smart local energy systems

Tools

Soutar, Iain and Devine-Wright, Patrick and Rohse, Melanie and Walker, Chad and Gooding, Luke and Devine-Wright, Hannah and Kay, Imogen (2022) Constructing practices of engagement with users and communities : comparing emergent state-led smart local energy systems. Energy Policy, 171. 113279. ISSN 1873-6777 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113279)

[thumbnail of Soutar-etal-EP-2022-comparing-emergent-state-led-smart-local-energy-systems]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Soutar_etal_EP_2022_comparing_emergent_state_led_smart_local_energy_systems.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Energy transitions require engagement with users, local communities and wider publics in order to be fair, acceptable and, ultimately, successful. Here we focus on the development of decentralised energy systems instigated by central government. Smart Local Energy Systems (SLES), involving low carbon generation, demand sources and smart technologies in a geographically-bounded location, are important but unexplored contexts for public engagement. Drawing on 23 interviews with partner organisations in 12 UK SLES projects, we investigate the targets, methods and rationales of engagement. Partners engage a range of user and community groups around multiple energy system components using a variety of methods, directly and via intermediary organisations. Project size is not a major influence on breadth and intensity of engagement. Project partners rationalise practices with reference to characterisations of users and engagement, and practices are conditioned by a range of factors (e.g. technological boundaries, place, partners involved, and the wider organisational context within which SLES projects take place). We highlight a need for future SLES policy to emphasise engagement as a key facet, institute systematic social learning between SLES projects, and consider how to engage publics beyond the boundaries of individual projects.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)