Do lawyers matter? Evidence from patents

Andriosopoulos, Dimitris and Czarnowski, Pawel and Marshall, Andrew P. (2022) Do lawyers matter? Evidence from patents. Preprint / Working Paper. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Amsterdam. (https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3966163)

[thumbnail of Andriosopoulos-etal-SSRN-2022-Do-lawyers-matter-evidence-patents]
Preview
Text. Filename: Andriosopoulos_etal_SSRN_2022_Do_lawyers_matter_evidence_patents.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Strathprints license 1.0

Download (682kB)| Preview

Abstract

We investigate the role of patent attorney capability in determining the economic and technological value of patents. First, we establish a positive correlation between attorneys' substantive expertise (success rate in obtaining patents) and the economic and technological value of patents. Also, we find no evidence that attorneys' process experience (number of patent applications filed) matters for patents. Then we identify the causal effect of patent attorney expertise by using two alternative approaches: changing to a more capable attorney and the openings of four new regional offices by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) between 2012 and 2015. Overall, we find that successful patent attorneys matter as they increase both the economic and technological value of patents. Therefore, innovative firms that employ patent attorneys should closely monitor their success track record.