Parallel or intersecting lines? Intelligent bibliometrics for investigating the involvement of data science in policy analysis

Zhang, Yi and Porter, Alan L. and Cunningham, Scott W. and Chiavetta, Denise and Newman, Nils (2021) Parallel or intersecting lines? Intelligent bibliometrics for investigating the involvement of data science in policy analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68 (5). pp. 1259-1271. ISSN 0018-9391 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2974761)

[thumbnail of Zhang-etal-IEEE-TEM-2021-Parallel-or-intersecting-lines-Intelligent-bibliometrics-for]
Preview
Text. Filename: Zhang_etal_IEEE_TEM_2021_Parallel_or_intersecting_lines_Intelligent_bibliometrics_for.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (2MB)| Preview

Abstract

Efforts to involve data science in policy analysis can be traced back decades but transforming analytic findings into decisions is still far from straightforward task. Data-driven decision-making requires understanding approaches, practices, and research results from many disciplines, which makes it interesting to investigate whether data science and policy analysis are moving in parallel or whether their pathways have intersected. Our investigation, from a bibliometric perspective, is driven by a comprehensive set of research questions, and we have designed an intelligent bibliometric framework that includes a series of traditional bibliometric approaches and a novel method of charting the evolutionary pathways of scientific innovation, which is used to identify predecessor–descendant relationships in technological topics. Our investigation reveals that data science and policy analysis have intersecting lines, and it can foresee that a cross-disciplinary direction in which policy analysis interacting with data science has become an emergent area in both communities. However, equipped with advanced data analytic techniques, data scientists are moving faster and further than policy analysts. The empirical insights derived from our research should be beneficial to academic researchers and journal editors in related research communities, as well as policy-makers in research institutions and funding agencies.