The system works fine : the positive relationship between emphasis on individual explanations for inequality and external political efficacy

Greenwood-Hau, Joe (2021) The system works fine : the positive relationship between emphasis on individual explanations for inequality and external political efficacy. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. 643165. ISSN 2673-3145 (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.643165)

[thumbnail of Greenwood-Hau-FPS-2021-The-system-works-fine]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Greenwood_Hau_FPS_2021_The_system_works_fine.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (778kB)| Preview

Abstract

This article addresses the largely overlooked question of whether explanations for inequality are related to appraisals of the political system. It posits a positive relationship between individual explanations for inequality and three indicators of appraisals of the political system: satisfaction with democracy, political trust, and external political efficacy. Individual explanations for inequality are a form of system justifying belief and constitute part of a wider ideological view of the status quo social order as just and defensible. This positive view of the functioning of society may flow over into appraisals of the political system, imply a positive disposition towards high-status groups including politicians, and remove the motivation to blame the political system for ongoing inequality (which is instead seen in a positive, meritocratic light). The relationships between explanations for inequality and appraisals of the political system are tested for the first time in the United States, using 2002 ANES data, and in Great Britain, using data from a survey fielded in 2014. The results in the United States show few consistent or significant relationships between explanations for inequality and any of the appraisals of the political system. However, the results in Great Britain show consistent, robust, and statistically significant positive relationships between individual explanations for inequality and external political efficacy. The inconsistency in these results may stem from the differing temporal and national contexts of the surveys. It is also likely that the ranking measures of explanations for inequality in the GB data distinguished respondents for whom individual explanations are particularly important, who have a less negative appraisal of external political efficacy. However, more work is required to investigate the effects of question format, the impact of national and temporal context, and the causal direction of the relationship between explanations for inequality and appraisals of the political system.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)