Dynamic and probabilistic multi-class prediction of tunnel squeezing intensity

Chen, Yu and Li, Tianbin and Zeng, Peng and Ma, Junjie and Patelli, Edoardo and Edwards, Ben (2020) Dynamic and probabilistic multi-class prediction of tunnel squeezing intensity. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 53 (8). pp. 3521-3542. ISSN 1434-453X (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02138-8)

[thumbnail of Chen-etal-RMRE-2020-Dynamic-and-probabilistic-multi-class-prediction-of-tunnel-squeezing]
Preview
Text. Filename: Chen_etal_RMRE_2020_Dynamic_and_probabilistic_multi_class_prediction_of_tunnel_squeezing.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (3MB)| Preview

Abstract

Tunnel squeezing is a time-dependent process that typically occurs in weak or over-stressed rock masses, significantly influencing the budget and time of tunnel construction. This paper presents a new framework to probabilistically predict the potential squeezing intensity and to dynamically update the prediction during construction based on the sequentially revealed ground information. An extensively well-documented database, which contains quantitative data from 154 squeezing sections with 95 unpublished inventories is established. A Decision Tree method is employed to train a probabilistic multi-classification model to predict the tunnel squeezing intensity. The trained classifier is then integrated with a Markovian geologic model, which features embedded Bayesian updating procedures, to achieve a dynamic prediction on the state probabilities of the geologic parameter within the model and the resulting squeezing intensity during excavation. An under-construction tunnel case—Miyaluo #3 tunnel—is used to illustrate the proposed framework. Results show that the Decision Tree classifier, as opposed to other black-box models, is easy to be interpreted. It provides reliable predictive accuracy while leading to insights into the understanding of the squeezing problem. The strength-stress ratio (SSR) is suggested to be the most important factor. Moreover, the implementation of the updating procedures is efficient since only a simple field test (e.g. Point Load index or Schmidt rebound index) is required. Multiple rounds of predictions within the updating process allow different levels of prediction, for example long-range, short-term, or immediate, to be extracted as useful information towards the decision-making of construction operations. Therefore, this framework can serve as a pragmatic tool to assist the selection of optimal primary-support and other construction strategies based on the potential squeezing risk.