Comment on "Fracking and the scope for public dissent" : The sentencing of The Frack Three (Richard Roberts, Simon Blevins, Richard Loizou, (Case Number T20180167)) and R v Roberts (Richard) [2018] EWCA Crim 2739

Ford, Christopher (2019) Comment on "Fracking and the scope for public dissent" : The sentencing of The Frack Three (Richard Roberts, Simon Blevins, Richard Loizou, (Case Number T20180167)) and R v Roberts (Richard) [2018] EWCA Crim 2739. Environmental Law Review, 21 (4). pp. 318-320. ISSN 1461-4529 (https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452919874204)

Preview

Text. Filename: Ford_ELR_2019_Comment_on_fracking_and_the_scope_for_public_dissent.pdf Accepted Author Manuscript Download (128kB)| Preview

Abstract

The recent ELR case comment1 on 'fracking and the scope for public dissent' is interesting, but perhaps lacks balance. Hawkins sets out the legal process regarding one particular case regarding fracking protestors and some of the wider context. She argues that this case is 'but one manifestation of the increased use of legal mechanisms to restrict protest'. She raises and critiques some of the recent events around fracking in the UK.

• Share and Export
  

  RDF+XMLBibTeXRIOXX2 XMLRDF+N-TriplesJSONDublin CoreAtomSimple MetadataReferMETSHTML CitationASCII CitationOpenURL ContextObjectEndNoteOpenURL ContextObject in SpanMODSMPEG-21 DIDLEP3 XMLData Cite XMLRIS (EndNote Online, Zotero, Ref manager, etc)RDF+N3Multiline CSV
• Item metadata

  Item type:	Article
  ID code:	71722
  Dates:	Date Event 1 December 2019 Published 22 July 2019 Accepted
  Subjects:	Law
  Department:	Faculty of Engineering > Civil and Environmental Engineering
  Depositing user:	Pure Administrator
  Date deposited:	06 Mar 2020 14:43
  Last modified:	09 Apr 2024 01:22
  Related URLs:	Scopus publication
  URI:	https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/71722