Systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of the efficacy of RhoA and Rho kinase inhibitors in animal models of ischaemic stroke
Vesterinen, Hanna M and Currie, Gillian L and Carter, Samantha and Mee, Sarah and Watzlawick, Ralf and Egan, Kieren J and Macleod, Malcolm R and Sena, Emily S (2013) Systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of the efficacy of RhoA and Rho kinase inhibitors in animal models of ischaemic stroke. Systematic Reviews, 2. ISSN 2046-4053 (https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-33)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Vesterinen_etal_SR_2013_Systematic_review_and_stratified_meta_analysis_of_the_efficacy_of_RhoA_and_Rho_kinase_inhibitors.pdf
Final Published Version License: Download (782kB)| Preview |
Abstract
There is currently only one clinically approved drug, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. The RhoA pathway, including RhoA and its downstream effector Rho kinase (ROCK), has been identified as a possible therapeutic target. Our aim was to assess the impact of study design characteristics and study quality on reported measures of efficacy and to assess for the presence and impact of publication bias. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on publications describing the efficacy of RhoA and ROCK inhibitors in animal models of focal cerebral ischaemia where outcome was assessed as a change in lesion size or neurobehavioural score, or both. We identified 25 published papers which met our inclusion criteria. RhoA and ROCK inhibitors reduced lesion size by 37.3% in models of focal cerebral ischaemia (95% CI, 28.6% to 46.0%, 41 comparisons), and reduced neurobehavioural data by 40.5% (33.4% to 47.7%, 30 comparisons). Overall study quality was low (median=4, interquartile range 3-5) and measures to reduce bias were seldom reported. Publication bias was prevalent and associated with a substantial overstatement of efficacy for lesion size. RhoA and ROCK inhibitors appear to be effective in animal models of stroke. However the low quality score, publication bias and limited number of studies are areas which need attention prior to conducting clinical trials.
ORCID iDs
Vesterinen, Hanna M, Currie, Gillian L, Carter, Samantha, Mee, Sarah, Watzlawick, Ralf, Egan, Kieren J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1639-4281, Macleod, Malcolm R and Sena, Emily S;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 67002 Dates: DateEvent20 May 2013Published1 May 2013AcceptedSubjects: Medicine
Medicine > Internal medicine > Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryDepartment: Faculty of Science > Computer and Information Sciences
Faculty of Engineering > Electronic and Electrical EngineeringDepositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 18 Feb 2019 15:20 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 12:13 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/67002