Knowledge, attitudes and perspective on adverse drug reaction reporting in a public sector hospital in South Africa : baseline analysis
Terblanche, Antionette and Meyer, Johanna and Godman, Brian and Summers, Robert (2017) Knowledge, attitudes and perspective on adverse drug reaction reporting in a public sector hospital in South Africa : baseline analysis. Hospital Practice. ISSN 2377-1003 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2017.1381013)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Terblanche_etal_HP_2017_Knowledge_attitudes_and_perspective_on_adverse_drug_reaction_reporting.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (613kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Background and aims: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can cause significant harm in patients; however, ADRs are under-reported in many countries, including South Africa, where evidence of a pharmacovigilance (PV) system to monitor and manage ADRs is a requirement for compliance with norms and standards for quality healthcare delivery. We conducted an analysis amongst health care professionals (HCPs) at Sebokeng Hospital to assess the situation there. Methods: Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire, targeting all medical practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and pharmacist assistants in the hospital. Current procedures for reporting of ADRs were documented. Records were reviewed to determine the number of ADR reports submitted for the 18-month period prior to the study. Data were analysed with SAS. Ethical clearance was obtained. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 132 HCPs (nurses: 58.3%; medical practitioners: 23.5%; pharmacist assistants: 11.4%; pharmacists: 6.8%). The vast majority indicated ADR reporting is necessary (96.2%) and their professional obligation (89.4%). Only 18.9% were aware of an existing PV system in the hospital, 15.2% had an ADR form available and 18.9% knew to whom the form should be submitted. The vast majority had never reported an ADR, had never received training in PV, but wanted training on ADR reporting. Factors discouraging ADR reporting included not knowing how to report them (53.8%), lack of time (37.1%), additional work load (22.0%), uncertainty about the outcome of reporting (32.6%), and lack of confidence to discuss ADRs with colleagues (22.0%). Only 2.3% knew how many ADRs were reported, that ADRs are discussed by a committee (6.1%) and that internal feedback is received on reported ADRs (6.1%). Conclusion: There is an extensive need in Sebokeng Hospital for training on ADR reporting and implementation of systems to facilitate relevant processes; a need which may also exist in other public hospitals in South Africa.
-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 61823 Dates: DateEvent15 September 2017Published15 September 2017Published Online14 September 2017AcceptedSubjects: Medicine > Pharmacy and materia medica Department: Faculty of Science > Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 21 Sep 2017 14:22 Last modified: 17 Nov 2024 01:13 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/61823