Geochemical tracers for monitoring offshore CO2 stores

Tools

Roberts, Jennifer J. and Gilfillan, Stuart M. V. and Stalker, Linda and Naylor, Mark (2017) Geochemical tracers for monitoring offshore CO2 stores. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 65. pp. 218-234. ISSN 1750-5836 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.07.021)

[thumbnail of Roberts-etal-JGGC-2017-Geochemical-tracers-for-monitoring-offshore-CO2-stores]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Roberts_etal_JGGC_2017_Geochemical_tracers_for_monitoring_offshore_CO2_stores.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (845kB)| Preview

Abstract

Chemical tracers are proposed as an effective means of detecting, attributing and quantifying any CO2 leaks to surface from geological CO2 storage sites, a key component of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology. A significant proportion of global CO2 storage capacity is located offshore, with some regions of the world having no onshore stores. To assure regulatory bodies and the public of CO2 storage integrity it is important to demonstrate that robust offshore monitoring systems are in place. A range of chemical tracers for leakage have been tested at onshore pilot CCS projects worldwide, but to date they have not been trialled at injection projects or CO2 release experiments located offshore. Here, for the first time, we critically review the current issues surrounding commercial scale use of tracers for offshore CCS projects, and examine the constraints and cost implications posed by the marine environment. These constraints include the logistics of sampling for tracers offshore, the fate of tracers in marine environments, tracer background levels, marine toxicity and legislative barriers – with particular focus on the Europe and the UK. It is clear that chemicals that form a natural component of the CO2 stream are preferable tracers for ease of permitting and avoiding cost and risks of procuring and artificially adding a tracer. However, added tracers offer more reliability in terms of their unique composition and the ability to control and regulate concentrations. We identify helium and xenon isotopes (particularly 124,129Xe), and artificial tracers such as PFCs and deuterated methane as the most suitable added tracers. This is due to their conservative behaviour, low environmental impact and relative inexpense. Importantly, we also find that SF6 and C14 are not viable tracers for CCS due to environmental concerns, and many other potential tracers can be ruled out on the basis of cost. Further, we identify key challenges that are unique to using tracers for offshore monitoring, and highlight critical uncertainties that future work should address. These include possible adsorption or dispersion of tracer compounds during ascent through the overburden, longevity of tracers over the timeframes relevant for CCS monitoring, the permissible environmental effects of tracer leakage, and tracer behaviour in seabed CO2 bubble streams and in dissolved CO2. These uncertainties directly affect the selection of appropriate tracers, the injection programme and concentrations necessary for their reliable detection, and appropriate sampling approaches. Hence offshore tracer selection and associated expense are currently poorly constrained. Further, there is limited experience of sampling for tracers in the marine environment; current approaches are expensive and must be streamlined to enable affordable monitoring strategies. Further work is necessary to address these unknowns so as to evaluate the performance of potential tracers for CO2 leak quantitation and provide more accurate costings for effective offshore tracer monitoring programmes.

ORCID iDs

Roberts, Jennifer J. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4505-8524, Gilfillan, Stuart M. V., Stalker, Linda and Naylor, Mark;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)