Storytelling and the scenario process : understanding success and failure
Bowman, Gary and MacKay, R. Bradley and Masrani, Swapnesh and Mckiernan, Peter (2013) Storytelling and the scenario process : understanding success and failure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (4). 735–748. ISSN 0040-1625 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.009)
Full text not available in this repository.Request a copyAbstract
Scenario planning has become a widely used strategic management approach for understanding future environmental uncertainty. Despite its increasing popularity in management practice, the theoretical underpinnings for scenario planning processes remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, there is little analysis on why some scenario methods succeed and others fail. To address this gap, we draw on storytelling theory as a conceptual lens for analyzing our data. This paper uses a longitudinal case study of two successive scenario planning interventions over a nine-year period in an intra-organizational partnership to investigate the efficacy of scenario planning development processes. Of the two interventions, the first, which followed what we term an ‘inductive’ method, was successful, meeting the objectives set by the organization, while the second approach, which we term ‘deductive’, was deemed a failure. We develop a process model explaining these divergent outcomes based on how meaning was either enabled or inhibited in the two methods through storytelling.
ORCID iDs
Bowman, Gary, MacKay, R. Bradley, Masrani, Swapnesh and Mckiernan, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-9124;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 55847 Dates: DateEvent1 May 2013Published8 May 2012Published Online11 April 2012AcceptedSubjects: Social Sciences > Industries. Land use. Labor > Management. Industrial Management Department: Strathclyde Business School > Strategy and Organisation Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 11 Mar 2016 10:39 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 11:20 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/55847