Right here right now (RHRN) pilot study : testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health
Naven, Lynn and Inglis, Greig and Harris, Rachel and Fergie, Gillian and Teal, Gemma and Phipps, Rebecca and Stewart, Sally and Kelly, Lorna and Hilton, Shona and Smith, Madeline and McCartney, Gerry and Walsh, David and Tolan, Matthew and Egan, James (2018) Right here right now (RHRN) pilot study : testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health. Evidence and Policy, 14 (2). pp. 301-321. ISSN 1744-2648 (https://doi.org/10.1332/174426417X14987303892451)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Naven-etal-EP-2018-Right-here-right-now-RHRN-pilot-study.pdf
Final Published Version License: ![]() Download (311kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Background: Informing policy and practice with up-to-date evidence on the social determinants of health is an ongoing challenge. One limitation of traditional approaches is the time-lag between identification of a policy or practice need and availability of results. The Right Here Right Now (RHRN) study piloted a near-real-time data-collection process to investigate whether this gap could be bridged. Methods: A website was developed to facilitate the issue of questions, data capture and presentation of findings. Respondents were recruited using two distinct methods - a clustered random probability sample, and a quota sample from street stalls. Weekly four-part questions were issued by email, Short Messaging Service (SMS or text) or post. Quantitative data were descriptively summarised, qualitative data thematically analysed, and a summary report circulated two weeks after each question was issued. The pilot spanned 26 weeks. Results: It proved possible to recruit and retain a panel of respondents providing quantitative and qualitative data on a range of issues. The samples were subject to similar recruitment and response biases as more traditional data-collection approaches. Participants valued the potential to influence change, and stakeholders were enthusiastic about the findings generated, despite reservations about the lack of sample representativeness. Stakeholders acknowledged that decision-making processes are not flexible enough to respond to weekly evidence. Conclusion: RHRN produced a process for collecting near-real-time data for policy-relevant topics, although obtaining and maintaining representative samples was problematic. Adaptations were identified to inform a more sustainable model of near-real-time data collection and dissemination in the future.
ORCID iDs
Naven, Lynn, Inglis, Greig, Harris, Rachel, Fergie, Gillian, Teal, Gemma, Phipps, Rebecca, Stewart, Sally, Kelly, Lorna, Hilton, Shona
-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 92270 Dates: DateEventMay 2018Published18 July 2017Published OnlineSubjects: Medicine > Public aspects of medicine > Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 06 Mar 2025 17:06 Last modified: 07 Mar 2025 02:03 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/92270